|
|
BY LINDA ROSENSTOCK
The events of Sept. 11 followed by the subsequent anthrax exposures
and threats of more bioterrorism have focused a great deal of
attention on the field of public health. Never before have the
words "public health infrastructure" rolled off the
tongues of so many in government, media and the general public.
While the circumstances that brought us this level of attention
are unfortunate, the attention to the field is long overdue. For
decades we have under-invested in the people, the technology and
systems that protect our health.
In fact, the public health infrastructure receives less than 3%
of the $1.2 trillion annual national health expenditures. An astounding
80% of the country's 450,000 public health workers are not formally
trained in public health. To add insult to injury, each year the
federal government spends only $2 million of its $300 million
health professional budget for preventive medicine training. Of
the Bush administration's proposed $1.6 billion for public health
defense, $1 billion is slated for stockpiling antibiotics and
vaccines leaving little for infrastructure improvements.
The need for bolstering the public health system is abundantly
clear. A 1999 survey of city and county health departments found
that 20% did not have e-mail capability, and that more than half
did not have continuous high-speed Internet access. A survey conducted
in October 2001 by the National Association of County and City
Health Officials found that 80% of city and county health departments
do not have comprehensive bioterror response plans in place. (A
little more than half of them have plans under development.) In
addition, 62% of health departments said they were only "somewhat
prepared" or "not prepared at all" to answer the
public's bioterror questions since Sept. 11. Furthermore, a 1998
study of 186 hospitals in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Alaska
found that over 80% had no plans for biological or chemical attacks.
Planning for such events has become a reality. However, even if
there were no more threats of anthrax or other such exposures
in our near future, such attention to bolstering a long neglected
system - a system that often gets ignored because it is invisible
when it is working best - will serve us all well in the years
to come. Surprising to many is the fact that each year in the
United States, 76 million people get sick, more than 300,000 are
hospitalized and 5,000 die from food borne illness. An improved
public health system would help detect, track and prevent many
of these incidents.
As a leading school of public health, UCLA is positioned to be
part of the infrastructure solution. The School of Public Health
offers our students training in bioterrorism, public health preparedness
and other disaster-related issues. In addition, we are uniquely
positioned to train the health professional workforce of California
and the West Coast in responding to these new threats of terrorism.
The school is also well poised to become the national model for
linkages between state and local health departments, academia
and community services to provide the public health infrastructure
necessary for the health risks we actively face on a day-to-day
basis. By so doing, we'll be much better positioned to also respond
to acts of terrorism.
Rosenstock is dean of the School of Public Health.
|
|