UCLA Today News Logo

:: UCLA TODAY Home

:: Contact Us
Search Archive
:: UCLA HOME

 

 

 

©2004
The Regents of the University of California
 

 
CONTROVERSIAL RESOLUTION PASSES
Faculty debate Iraqi war

Senate members voted 180 to 7 to adopt a resolution to “deplore the doctrine of preventive war espoused by the President of which the invasion of Iraq is the first application.” The special meeting, called by faculty who backed the resolution, is the first to be held by the UCLA Academic Senate since the early '70s.

BY MARINA DUNDJERSKI
UCLA Today Staff

In a special session April 14, the Academic Senate adopted a controversial resolution against the war in Iraq and called for international oversight in the country’s rebuilding.

Approved by a 180-to-7 vote, the resolution states, in part, that the assembled faculty “deplore the doctrine of preventive war espoused by the President of which the invasion of Iraq is the first application.” It further states opposition to “the establishment of an American protectorate in Iraq.”

As faculty members waited more than an hour in Korn Convocation Hall for a quorum of 200 to show up, speakers on both sides took to the microphones to debate whether the resolution on the war was an appropriate issue for the Senate to take up.

“We offer exactly what is needed — careful, considered reflection based on reason, detached from the world of emotions that inevitably still the critical debate that our nation so badly needs,” said Roger Waldinger, chair of the sociology department and one of the antiwar organizers who called for the meeting. “Moreover, our meeting is entirely consistent with our educational mission. Today, we affirm our deepest commitments that it is always time, and always right to ask questions ... that law and reason should prevail over force.”

However, several faculty said the action went beyond the Senate’s purview.

“It seems to me that this is something that all of us may engage in and debate in our living rooms, or on e-mail lists or on op-ed pages, but it is not something that the faculty Senate should be doing,” said Eugene Volokh, law professor. “It is a misuse of the very substantial cachet, the title of professor at UCLA.”

Originally, several members approached Academic Senate Chair Duncan Lindsey to call for a special session. But Lindsey declined to do so because he believed the matter belonged outside the Senate. However, bylaws state that a special meeting must be held if at least 200 members request it; a petition with more than 200 names was submitted.

In a probable next step, mail balloting of all 3,300 members will be done if 35 signatures are collected.

Faculty at UC Santa Barbara passed a similar resolution Feb. 24.

 

Copyright 2003 UC Regents
Questions / Problems? | [HOME]