UCLA Today News Logo

:: UCLA TODAY Home

:: Contact Us
Search Archive
:: UCLA HOME

 

 

 

©2004
The Regents of the University of California
 

 
VOL. 24. NO.6 NOVEMBER 18, 2003

Holiday closure would help save energy costs

BY KAREN MACK
UCLA Today Staff

Chancellor Albert Carnesale last week announced plans to close the UCLA campus from Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2003, through Thursday, Jan. 1, 2004, in order to save on energy expenditures. With the exception of the UCLA hospital system and other facilities authorized to remain open for essential services, buildings would be closed for the entire nine-day period.

The first campuswide holiday closure in UCLA’s history is intended “to reduce energy costs in a time of tightening budgets and high energy prices,” Carnesale wrote in a campuswide e-mail to faculty and staff. Despite implementing a variety of energy-saving measures, the university still faces a projected annual deficit of $2.5 million in its purchased utilities budget.

With energy prices at historically high levels, the cost of natural gas and electricity now significantly exceeds the amount of state funding UCLA receives for purchased utilities — primarily natural gas to run the central Cogeneration Plant. According to Jack Powazek, assistant vice chancellor for general services, the unit price of natural gas has increased by 67% since 1999-2000, but state allocations have not kept pace.

During the nine-day span, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems would be shut down in buildings that do not house research laboratories or other areas requiring extensive temperature control. Facilities Management would work with building coordinators to ensure that all computer server rooms would continue to be air-conditioned.

“The holiday closure would save more than $200,000 due to the ability to turn off HVAC systems in more than 30 buildings across the campus,” Powazek said. Authorized keyholders would be able to enter the affected buildings as necessary during the closure, he noted.

The closure period includes three weekdays that are not paid university holidays — Dec. 26, Dec. 29 and Dec. 30. Consequently, staff employees and those academic employees who accrue vacation leave would have three options, which may be used separately or in combination, for taking off those days:

  • Paid vacation time. For this period only, employees with insufficient vacation credits may use vacation time in advance of accrual. Probationary employees may use vacation time prior to attaining regular-employee status.
  • Compensatory time off. If available, compensatory time off may be used, subject to supervisory approval and in accordance with applicable university policies and labor agreements.
  • Leave of absence without pay.

Questions about benefits during leave, or related matters, may be directed to Campus Human Resources at (310) 794-0877 or School of Medicine HR at (310) 794-0683. The proposal will be finalized, at Carnesale’s discretion, after the campus community has had an opportunity to review and comment.

Although a first for the campus overall, the proposed holiday closure follows successful precedents set by several UCLA units, including the Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.

In addition, Carnesale noted, “similar practices have been followed for years at many other universities, including a number of UC campuses.”

The holiday closure is among a range of proposals being developed by faculty and administrators in the Energy Conservation Task Group, established last summer to recommend ways to reduce campus energy costs. The task group will present its full report to Carnesale in early 2004.

These efforts supplement UCLA’s ongoing energy-conservation activities; recent examples include construction of the Thermal Energy Facility and the campus re-lamping program.