UCLA Today News Logo

:: UCLA TODAY Home

:: Contact Us
Search Archive
:: UCLA HOME

 

 

 

©2004
The Regents of the University of California
 

 
VOL. 24. NO.9 FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Photo by Irene Fertik UCLA Today
Professor Emeritus Edwin Shneidman speaks about suicide at a UCLA Extension seminar given in his honor.

the father of suicidology

Probing the frustrated mind

BY AJAY SINGH
UCLA Today Staff

To understand Edwin Shneidman, professor emeritus of thanatology, the study of the phenomena of death, it’s important to know two things.

First, that he was a sickly child who stayed home a lot, curled up in bed with the Encyclopedia Britannica. And second, that Shneidman believes that about 50% of what he knows is the result of perusing the Britannica, a work he once reverently equated with the Old Testament, the Koran and the Upanishads.

In 1973, when Shneidman was in his mid-50s, the Britannica published seven pages of his writing on a subject that has been his lifelong passion: suicide. Shneidman is a pioneering authority on suicide with the David Geffen School of Medicine, founder of the American Association of Suicidology and author of numerous books on suicide, including, just recently, “Autopsy of a Suicidal Mind.”

Shneidman’s interest in suicide began with a 1949 visit to the Los Angeles coroner’s office. As a budding clinical psychologist, he was investigating the suicides of two men — one of whom had left a suicide note. Although Shneidman had never seen a suicide note before, the scientist in him told him not to read it — lest he find his own prejudices in the note. Instead, for experimental purposes, he began collecting hundreds of suicide notes, including a number solicited from non-suicidal people, all of which he also did not read. Then, with a colleague’s help, he began to analyze the notes without knowing the writers’ identities or intentions.

A UCLA alumnus, Shneidman had been trained in John Stuart Mill’s method of inductive reasoning — the process of arriving from a number of particular observations to a generalization. Using the “method of difference,” which lies at the heart of induction, Shneidman and his colleague were able to tell with great accuracy which suicide notes were genuine and which were not. Scientific suicidology, it is said, was born on the day that Shneidman set foot in that coroner’s office.

Suicide, according to Shneidman, results from “psychache,” a word he coined to describe the unbearable psychological pain arising largely from frustrated psychological needs. “There is a great deal of psychological pain in the world without suicide,” said Shneidman with the insight of someone with a deep understanding of self-annihilation. “But there is no suicide without a great deal of psychological pain.”

It’s a disturbing thought, given that every 18 minutes someone commits suicide in the United States. It’s also why Shneidman considers it his moral responsibility to explore the roots of life-threatening psychological pain.

At 85 and no longer in the best of health, Shneidman spends a lot of time thinking about his own death. But his musings are far from morbid. What sets him apart from a lot of us is his profoundly philosophical claim: “A rich contemplation of death and dying makes that much richer a full participation in life and living.”