UCLA Today News Logo

:: UCLA TODAY Home

:: Contact Us
Search Archive
:: UCLA HOME

 

 

 

©2004
The Regents of the University of California
 

 
VOL. 24. NO.16 JUNE 29, 2004

GUARDING AGAINST IDENTITY THEFT

UCLA tightens data security

BY AJAY SINGH
UCLA Today Staff

Campus authorities have intensified efforts to protect and heighten awareness about personal and sensitive data on computers after a laptop was stolen from a locked van at a UCLA blood drive last November and another laptop was pilfered from a UCLA Healthcare financial office in late May.

The two laptops contained information that included such details as names and Social Security numbers, which could potentially be used to steal an individual’s identity. The first computer taken from the van held a database containing personal data from some 145,000 donors to the UCLA Blood and Platelet Center.

Campus officials are taking no chances with identity theft, one of the fastest-growing crimes in the country. “In order to prevent any unauthorized access to personal information in the future, UCLA Healthcare is taking steps to further enhance the security of its computer systems,” said Michael McCoy, chief information technology officer for UCLA Medical Center.

“We’re going back through past reports of thefts to be sure that anything with sensitive information has been accounted for,” said Jim Davis, associate vice chancellor of information technology. There is no indication so far of any “pattern of identity theft cases” at UCLA.

Inventories of computers on campus exist, “but the question is: What is on those computers?,” Davis pointed out. “Then there is the matter of PDAs and home computers with which people are accessing campus resources as well.”

UCLA has always taken care to protect personal and sensitive data, officials said. Such efforts have only intensified since July 2003, when a new state law designed to help prevent identity theft went into effect. The law applies to personal data exposed in an unauthorized manner, whether through theft of computer equipment or through compromise of computers on a network.

“What has happened now is that we’ve had an event in the middle of our response,” Davis said. “Since last year we have run security seminars, produced reports and issued a letter to faculty and staff. We’re now preparing successive communications, along with taking several steps we’re in the process of implementing.”

The first step was the creation of a network of security breach coordinators — one for each major academic or administrative unit — to look into what kind of personal data is stored on computers. “Where there is sensitive data on a computer, we’re looking at both its electronic and physical security,” said Davis. “We’re also looking at security when people access and download data.”

Part of the coordinators’ job is to ascertain who the proprietor or custodian of sensitive data is, whether it pertains to a school, division or unit, and if the data is appropriately protected.

“What needs to happen first — and is, by and large, already happening — is that people need to ask, ‘Do I really need to have this sensitive data at all?’ ” said Davis, adding, “This is already driving people on campus to remove some data from their computers.”

If they do need a piece of sensitive data, the second question focuses on the details in that data: Does it have to include a full Social Security number, or is it sufficient to retain only the last four digits? This is an important issue that extends beyond data used for patients or blood donors.

“We find examples where faculty write recommendation letters for students, which, in the past, have often required students’ names and their Social Security numbers,” said Davis. “More recently, there have been a number of significant efforts to move away from using Social Security numbers entirely.”

Finally, if sensitive data must be used, appropriate physical and electronic safeguards must be in place, including protecting passwords from unauthorized use. But given the alarming escalation in identity theft, stressed Davis, “I consider the first two questions to be the primary defense in terms of addressing laws whose real intention is to help protect privacy.”

For more information on protection of personal and sensitive information, visit www.icompass.ucla.edu/policies/personal_info.htm.