UCLA Today News Logo

:: UCLA TODAY Home

:: Contact Us
Search Archive
:: UCLA HOME

 

 

 

©2004
The Regents of the University of California
 

 
VOL. 25. NO.5 NOVEMBER 9, 2004

Vote opens up new funding

BY CYNTHIA LEE
UCLA Today Staff

Despite the chasm that divided the nation over the presidential race, election 2004 brought together a majority of California voters in support of some important issues that will have consequences for UC and UCLA.

For one, California voters passed Proposition 61, which authorizes the state to issue $750 million in general obligation bonds to fund grants to children’s hospitals. Under the funding formula, UC’s five children’s hospitals, including Mattel Children’s Hospital at UCLA, will receive a total of $150 million.

“That’s fantastic news for the children of California,” said Edward McCabe, executive chair of the Department of Pediatrics and physician-in-chief of the hospital. “What that says to me is that voters recognize that children are very special, a segment of the population with underserved needs that too often gets lost in the health-care system.”

While it’s not yet clear how the $150 million will be divided, McCabe said he hopes some of the money will be used to equip the new Mattel replacement hospital for children.

With the passage of Proposition 71, the initiative to fund stem cell research in California, UC is expected to play a major role in two ways. President Robert C. Dynes pledged that UC will work hard to contribute to the success of the initiative, “both by participating in its governance, and, we hope, by conducting some significant part of the research.”

The state will issue tax-free bonds to provide an average of $295 million a year over 10 years (for a total of $3 billion) to support stem cell research at California universities, medical schools and privately funded research groups.

Each of UC’s five medical campuses will appoint one representative to a newly created 29-member oversight commission that will set research standards and allocate grants. UC is also eligible to fill as many as two of the four slots designated for representatives of California universities.

While no one knows how much research funding will come UC’s way, “We believe that UCLA, UC San Francisco and perhaps UC San Diego will be primary competitors for this funding,” said Assistant Vice Chancellor for Government and Community Relations Keith Parker.

There is significant stem cell research already being conducted at UCLA, noted Jerome Zack, professor of hematology and oncology/microbiology, immunology and molecular genetics at the David Geffen School of Medicine. Zack is working on adult blood-forming stem cells. Proposition 71 funding “could very well support this kind of research. It would be beneficial to study stem cells at all levels.”

In the area of mental health, voters approved Proposition 63, imposing a 1% tax on taxable income over $1 million to fund additional county mental health services, among others. This infusion of funds will give UCLA psychiatrists the opportunity to build on a partnership they forged with the county five years ago, said psychiatrist Milton H. Miller, professor emeritus of psychiatry and biobehavioral sciences and deputy director of the county’s mental health department. UCLA’s research strength to evaluate program outcomes and ability to train mental health professionals could aid this expansion.

Another election outcome, the passage of Proposition 1A to amend the state constitution to prevent state raids on local government’s share of sales taxes, local property taxes and vehicle license fee revenues, may affect UC indirectly. “It could reduce the ability of the Legislature to reallocate funds by keeping that money in local government’s control,” Parker explained.

While several friends of UCLA and officials who have had contact with the university won seats in the Assembly, the election did nothing to change the balance of power in the Assembly and the Senate, Parker said. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger will again need Democratic support to pass the state budget in 2005, and the debates over spending cuts versus tax increases will likely continue.

“There is clearly a need, and hopefully the motivation and opportunity, to break the gridlock and work in a more bipartisan way on the issues that confront California,” Parker said.

UCLA Staff Assembly is inviting all to hear more from Parker about the election on Nov. 12 at noon at the Faculty Center. To reserve a seat, e-mail sgamble@cts.ucla.edu.