UCLA Today News Logo

:: UCLA TODAY Home

:: Contact Us
Search Archive
:: UCLA HOME

 

 

 

©2004
The Regents of the University of California
 

 
VOL. 25. NO.9 FEBRUARY 9, 2005
Rosina Becerra
Photo by Reed Hutchinson UCLA Photographic Services

A Builder of campus partnerships

Making strides toward faculty diversity

Since 2002, Associate Vice Chancellor Rosina Becerra has headed the Office of Faculty Diversity, which was created by Chancellor Albert Carnesale as part of his commitment to diversity as a cornerstone on which to build academic excellence. Becerra, who has been at UCLA for 30 years as a professor of social welfare, department chair and dean, leads the campus’ diversity efforts, which include disseminating information and advice on enhancing faculty diversity via the Web, faculty workshops and meetings with faculty, chairs and deans. Her office is involved in not only educating faculty, but also building a network of resources to support faculty retention.

Since Becerra began leading this effort, there have been two campuswide gender equity summits to focus on strategies for addressing recruitment, retention, promotion, leadership and other issues. Recently, her office published a monograph that gives each department statistics that show whether women and minorities are being underutilized in their representation on the faculty, compared to their availability in the job market.

Most recently, Chancellor Carnesale reaffirmed his commitment to diversity by taking an important step. He has decided to allocate additional faculty FTEs for 2005 and 2006 to assist Becerra’s efforts. “The diversity of UCLA’s faculty, students and staff remains one of my highest priorities,” the chancellor wrote in a letter to Becerra announcing his decision. “I am confident that, with your guidance, these FTEs will be utilized to the fullest extent possible in support of our shared goal of enhancing faculty diversity on the UCLA campus.”

UCLA Today Editor Cynthia Lee sat down with Becerra to talk about her mission and these latest developments.

Q: Why is faculty diversity a top priority for this campus?
A: We teach in one of the most heterogeneous regions of the country, perhaps the world. To create a rich academic experience for our students and a cultural environment where all feel welcome, it’s essential that we have both the strongest faculty academically, and one that also represents all sectors of our society.
A diverse faculty is needed to attract and support a diverse student body. Students see faculty members as role models. Whether they are women or members of underrepresented groups, students can envision their own potential through these faculty, many of whom had to overcome the same obstacles and barriers these students may encounter. It’s our responsibility to help students find a way to get through, over or around those barriers.

Q: How far have we as a campus come to achieving faculty diversity?
A: If you look across the campus, including the medical school, the numbers among ladder-rank faculty have remained steady over the last five years — at 8% for African Americans, Native Americans and Latinos combined, for example. The percentage of Asians has increased from 12% to 13%. The percentage of women on the faculty has risen slightly, from 23% to 24%. So we’re in an upward trajectory, but certainly not at any rapid pace. We have work ahead. Social change takes time
to achieve.

Q: How will this change come about?
A: I have to make sure we search for new faculty hires as broadly and inclusively as we can. When you look at all the doctorates that are being awarded, approximately 50% are going to women. Racial and ethnic minorities make up a much smaller percentage of new Ph.D.s. Also, the greatest number of women and racial and ethnic minorities tend to be in the humanities and social sciences, as opposed to science, engineering, mathematics and the more technical fields. So the challenge for us is to increase the applicant pool in those areas where the supply is larger and pay even greater attention to what’s happening in fields where women and minorities
are underrepresented.

Q: How are you working with departments to widen the scope of
their searches?

A: It’s very easy for departmental faculty to say, “I know the best person for this position. Let’s grab him.” Doing a broader search is hard work. To give the departments and divisions some idea of the availability of women and minorities in their fields, we’ve sent a monograph to every ladder-rank faculty member that includes underutilization data for the first time. For each department and division, the report lists the number of women, African Americans, Chicanos/Latinos, Asian/Pacific Islanders and Native Amer-icans on the faculty. We compare that number with the estimated number of faculty available in that particular discipline nationwide. The difference between those two percentages is what we call the underutilization estimate for that academic unit. In addition, there are charts that show how many women and minorities are assistant, associate or full professors in each department and division as well as campuswide.

Q: Are you giving this number or percentage as a goal for departments to strive for?
A: No, the data is made available as information to guide our recruitment efforts. Faculty want information, and that’s what I am trying to provide. This report gives departments information about where they need to put more effort in generating their applicant pools. The argument that the applicant pool doesn’t include women or minorities because they’re not graduating in a field isn’t based on reality in some cases. I’m trying to let everyone know where we stand. We’re not the best; we are not the worst. But I believe that, with some more effort, we can be the best.

Q: Can you penalize departments that show large shortfalls?
A: I am not the diversity police. I am a partner in a joint effort. Nothing gets done unless there is buy-in. My personal philosophy is one of building partnerships. I believe the number of relationships I’ve built with the deans and chairs will further our goals of excellence in all areas. They know they can come to me for help and information.

Rather than a stick, I offer them assistance. If they’re having problems recruiting someone because a spouse or partner needs a job, I can help. UCLA is one of the founding members of the Southern California Higher Education Resource Consortium, a group of community colleges and universities that pool their Web-based job listings to both broaden our faculty searches and assist spouses and partners of faculty and staff in finding area employment. My office also works closely with the UCLA Alumni Association to help find an alumnus who might advise a spouse on a job search in a particular field.

This is really where being a social worker helps. I’m used to linking individuals with resources and advocating for underrepresented groups. For example, I try to connect faculty families with available resources on the campus, such as housing, child care or schooling.

I also have some financial resources that I use to assist in attracting faculty here. If a department doesn’t have all the resources it needs to offer a faculty member, I can partner with it financially and often meet with the candidate to answer questions about our campus community.

Q: What can you tell us about the chancellor’s recent decision to enhance faculty diversity?
A: The chancellor has allocated additional FTEs that will be a great help as I work with the deans, chairs and directors to meet the campus’ diversity goals. As associate vice chancellor, I consider the diversity needs of the entire campus. I have an annual budget that I leverage to enable hires and retentions.

Lately, I have been focusing on how to increase diversity in areas with few women and minorities — in particular, the sciences. We have African-American and Latino graduate students in the sciences who have received STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathe-
matics) grants from the National Science Foundation. We are interested in attracting science faculty members to UCLA who have a commitment to and history of mentoring a diverse pool of graduate students, so that we can increase that pool of students in these fields. I am now working with Dean Tony Chan (Division of Physical Sciences) and Dean Emil Reisler (Division of Life Sciences) in the College to put together an initiative that focuses on recruiting faculty in science fields who will support and mentor STEM recipients. We hope to have some faculty hires for fall 2005 and for fall 2006. These FTEs will not in any way solve the problem, but they are — in these budget times — a significant commitment in the right direction.

Q: Do you have any other strategies?
A: We are facing a very critical time — many of our faculty will soon be in the age range of 65 to 70 when many of our ladder faculty will choose to retire. We could lose as many as 30% of our ladder faculty to retirement in the next five years. That poses both a challenge and an opportunity. By bringing in junior faculty, where women and underrepresented groups are more likely to be available for recruitment, we could increase their representation on the faculty. But we also need to pay attention to retention, particularly with our mid-level faculty as well as our outstanding senior faculty. It’s a tricky balance. I will be working to put together a strategic plan on hiring and how we might think about this.

Q: What else can be done to enhance faculty diversity?
A: Mentoring. Mentorship is not the same for everyone. You may not need a mentor to hold your hand as you move along. But it may be helpful if a senior faculty says, “Hey, I’d like to recommend you to present at our annual professional conference.” Sometimes mentoring is just being a sounding board for someone who wants to talk with another faculty member who is not in the same department.

Mentorship is not something we all know how to do, nor want to do. There are those faculty who feel very strongly that since they made it on their own, so can you. But some feel an obligation to help others along the pathway to tenure and promotion.

I’m now putting together a committee to look at mentorship. We need to get a sense of the extent to which departments are involved in mentorship and whether it is limited to assistant professors. In response to the Gender Equity Summit and Academic Climate Report, we are now organizing a workshop on mentorship. Additionally, we’re arranging with an outside consultant to offer a workshop on the art of negotiation. How should we negotiate on salaries, promotions or retention? Another effort is to build a consortium with my colleagues at other UC campuses, Stanford, Claremont and other universities to begin tracking the number of women and minority graduate students who are earning Ph.D.s in California in every field so we can assist in the recruitment of applicants. We are meeting at Stanford this month to begin to put this effort in place.

Q: You seem to be involved in many different areas.
A: Supporting diversity isn’t just about hiring faculty. It’s about building a
welcoming environment in this institution where all faculty want to come and want to stay. We have difficulty competing with salaries that the elite private universities can offer. UCLA has to be a place that supports your interests, recognizes your contributions and welcomes you into its community of scholars. Accomplishing all this is a large task. And we obviously cannot move as quickly as I and others may want us to. We are making progress. One day we won’t need my position any longer, because enhancing diversity in all aspects of the campus community will be occurring spontaneously.